Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nathaniel Lammons vs Andrew Korinek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lammons vs Korinek analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathaniel Lammons vs Andrew Korinek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lammons 1 - 0 Korinek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lammons has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Korinek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lammons, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Korinek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lammons has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Korinek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lammons has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Korinek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Korinek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lammons winning 1 times and Korinek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lammons winning 2 and Korinek winning 0. The last match between Lammons and Korinek was at the USA F31, 10-10-2016, Q3, Hard with Nathaniel Lammons getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lammons and Korinek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lammons winning 0 times and Korinek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lammons winning 0, and Korinek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lammons has played against opponents with an average rank of while Korinek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lammons has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Korinek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lammons has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Korinek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
591
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
54% (78-67)
Career Total W/L
54% (22-19)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nathaniel Lammons vs Andrew Korinek For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lammons VS Korinek
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Andrew Korinek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Andrew Korinek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70%
(
87 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
37 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
23 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrew Korinek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zihao Xia
Player
Andrew Korinek
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mauricio Echazu
Player
Andrew Korinek
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
3
Aces
17
4
Double Faults
10
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Korinek
Player
Franco Agamenone
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Korinek
Player
Nicolas Doria Medina
59%
(
64 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
64 of
120)
16
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
40%
(
18 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
120
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Lammons Vs Korinek Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lammons are available here and Korinek photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
